Larry Solum has been on quite a roll lately, with several fascinating and perceptive posts. There was
this post on foxes vs. hedgehogs in the legal academy. Then
this post on the prospects for peer-reviewed legal journals. Finally,
this post handily exposes a non sequitur in Jack Balkin's notion that because there could be a split between the original
public meaning of the Constitution and original
expected applications, therefore the original public meaning can be used to support
contemporary applications that are
much further removed from (or even contrary to) original expected applications.
No comments:
Post a Comment